A viewset for viewing and editing Government Restrictions on Conversions.

GET /api/rt/government-restrictions-on-conversions/?ordering=drb_reviewed
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, POST, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "count": 324,
    "next": "https://seshatdata.com/api/rt/government-restrictions-on-conversions/?ordering=drb_reviewed&page=2",
    "previous": null,
    "results": [
        {
            "id": 259,
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "description": "‘‘‘ NB the following quote only refers to Jews, and does not describe how rulers dealt with Arians and pagans; however, the literature consulted does not mention notable persecutions of or restrictions on either group in the period under consideration, suggesting there were likely none.  ‘Finally, the public behavior of Jews on certain Christian holidays, mainly during Holy Week, was regulated. This last aspect was first adopted in canon 33 (30) at Orléans in 538; it was not present in Roman conciliar legislation (Mikat 1995, p. 37; Linder 1997, no. 818; Lotter 1997, p. 874). Merovingian conciliar legislation against mixed marriages was less severe than that in the late Roman Empire (Lotter 1997, p. 855). More than half of all the councils dealing with Jews addressed the issue of Christian slaves in Jewish ownership. As a rule, the church did not question the right of Jews to possess such slaves. However, the clerics tried to prevent “Jewish proselytism,” which may not have been due to active missionary activity, but rather to the attractiveness of Judaism. The principal aim of the church was to protect the Christian faith of the slaves who were serving Jewish masters.\"§REF§ (Drews 2020, 126) Drews, Wolfram. 2020. Migrants and Minorities in Merovingian Gaul. The Oxford Handbook of the Merovingian World. Pp.117 - 138. Seshat URL: <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/95Z99GVQ\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"fw-bolder\"> <b> Zotero link: 95Z99GVQ </b></a> §REF§",
            "note": null,
            "finalized": true,
            "created_date": null,
            "modified_date": "2024-02-15T11:27:19.206015Z",
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "expert_reviewed": true,
            "drb_reviewed": false,
            "name": "Government restrictions on conversion",
            "coded_value": "present",
            "polity": {
                "id": 304,
                "name": "FrMervE",
                "start_year": 481,
                "end_year": 543,
                "long_name": "Early Merovingian",
                "new_name": "fr_merovingian_emp_1",
                "polity_tag": "LEGACY",
                "general_description": "In the early Merovingian period (481-543 CE), numerous Frankish kingdoms were united under the nominal leadership of Clovis I, who is traditionally considered to have become king of the Salian Franks in 481 CE. §REF§ (Drew 1991, 5) Drew, Katherine Fischer. 1991. “Introduction.” In The Laws of the Salian Franks: Translated and with an Introduction by Katherine Fischer Drew, 1-56. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/BT6A8ZH6\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/BT6A8ZH6</a>. §REF§  Under Clovis, the capital moved from Tournai to Paris. §REF§ (Wood 1994, 41) Wood, Ian. 1994. The Merovingian Kingdoms 450-751. London: Longman. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/ARUIRN35\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/ARUIRN35</a>. §REF§  §REF§ (DeVries and Smith 2007, 230) DeVries, Kelly, and Robert D. Smith. 2007. Medieval Weapons: An Illustrated History of Their Impact. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/ZDQNCFQQ\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/ZDQNCFQQ</a>. §REF§ <br><i>Population and political organization</i><br>Merovingian France was a largely decentralized kingdom based on the pre-existing Roman administrative system, in which cities were the basic units. §REF§ (Loseby 1998, 245-49) Loseby, S. T. 1998. “Gregory’s Cities: Urban Functions in Sixth-Century Gaul.” In Franks and Alamanni in the Merovingian Period: An Ethnographic Perspective, edited by I. N. Wood, 239-69. Woodbridge: Boydell Press. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/DT5E5GNS\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/DT5E5GNS</a>. §REF§  The city rulers, known as counts or <i>grafio</i>, who sent the king his tax revenue and carried out judicial and administrative functions, had access to both administrative officials and city archives (<i>gesta municipalia</i>). §REF§ (Wood 1994, 204) Wood, Ian. 1994. The Merovingian Kingdoms 450-751. London: Longman. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/ARUIRN35\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/ARUIRN35</a>. §REF§  §REF§ (Loseby 1998, 245-49) Loseby, S. T. 1998. “Gregory’s Cities: Urban Functions in Sixth-Century Gaul.” In Franks and Alamanni in the Merovingian Period: An Ethnographic Perspective, edited by I. N. Wood, 239-69. Woodbridge: Boydell Press. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/DT5E5GNS\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/DT5E5GNS</a>. §REF§  Groups of cities and counts could be placed under a duke for military and administrative purposes. §REF§ (Bachrach 1972, 67) Bachrach, Bernard S. 1972. Merovingian Military Organization 481-751. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/SG5XNFPG\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/SG5XNFPG</a>. §REF§ <br>In contrast, there was no elaborate central administration, the highest non-royal official being a figure known as the mayor of the palace. §REF§ (Halsall 2003, 28) Halsall, Guy. 2003. Warfare and Society in the Barbarian West, 450-900. London: Routledge. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/Z5EZBP2R\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/Z5EZBP2R</a>. §REF§  The king's capital and main residence was at Paris, where the population may have reached 30,000 by the 8th century CE, §REF§ (Clark and Henneman, Jr. 1995, 1316) Clark, William W., and John Bell Henneman, Jr. 1995. “Paris.” In Medieval France: An Encyclopedia, edited by William W. Kibler, Grover A. Zinn, Lawrence Earp, and John Bell Henneman, Jr., 1314-30. New York: Garland Publishing. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/HS8644XK\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/HS8644XK</a>. §REF§  although the court was always a peripatetic institution. §REF§ (Wood 1994, 150-53) Wood, Ian. 1994. The Merovingian Kingdoms 450-751. London: Longman. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/ARUIRN35\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/ARUIRN35</a>. §REF§  The king consulted a group of magnates (<i>obtimates</i>) at an annual gathering around 1 March. Written references to royal edicts are known from 614 CE onwards, but earlier royal legislation has not survived. §REF§ (Fouracre 1998, 286-89) Fouracre, P. J. 1998. “The Nature of Frankish Political Institutions in the Seventh Century.” In Franks and Alamanni in the Merovingian Period: An Ethnographic Perspective, edited by Ian Wood, 285-316. Woodbridge: Boydell Press. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/GT2AINW4\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/GT2AINW4</a>. §REF§  Merovingian kings had the authority to appoint dukes and counts as well as bishops, who were often 'royal servants with no known connections with their sees'. §REF§ (Wood 1994, 78) Wood, Ian. 1994. The Merovingian Kingdoms 450-751. London: Longman. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/ARUIRN35\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/ARUIRN35</a>. §REF§ <br>From 622 CE onwards the basic territorial divisions of the Merovingian Kingdom were Neustria (centred on the Seine and Oise rivers and associated with the <i>Pactus Legis Salicae</i> law code), §REF§ (Wood 1994, 112-15) Wood, Ian. 1994. The Merovingian Kingdoms 450-751. London: Longman. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/ARUIRN35\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/ARUIRN35</a>. §REF§  Burgundy (where the <i>Liber Constitutionum</i> was developed), and Austrasia (by the Rhine and Meuse, which came to possess its own mayor of the palace §REF§ (Fanning 1995, 157) Fanning, Steven. 1995. “Austrasia.” In Medieval France: An Encyclopedia, edited by William W. Kibler, Grover A. Zinn, Lawrence Earp, and John Bell Henneman, Jr., 156-57. New York: Garland Publishing. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/GR2MKFDX\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/GR2MKFDX</a>. §REF§  and followed the Lex Ribvaria). §REF§ (Wood 1994, 112-15) Wood, Ian. 1994. The Merovingian Kingdoms 450-751. London: Longman. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/ARUIRN35\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/ARUIRN35</a>. §REF§  A fourth area, Aquitaine, had a special status due to its distance from the royal centres and was under less direct Merovingian control. §REF§ (Wood 1994, 100, 146) Wood, Ian. 1994. The Merovingian Kingdoms 450-751. London: Longman. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/ARUIRN35\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/ARUIRN35</a>. §REF§  In the earliest times, Merovingian administration beyond the Rhine (in modern-day Germany) was less elaborate than that imposed further to the west: counts sent to rule in the east did not attempt to introduce literacy, currency or Christianity to their domains. §REF§ (Anderson 2013, 126-27) Anderson, Perry. 2013. Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism. London: Verso. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/K6F5NBFF\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/K6F5NBFF</a>. §REF§ ",
                "shapefile_name": null,
                "private_comment": null,
                "created_date": null,
                "modified_date": null,
                "home_nga": {
                    "id": 2,
                    "name": "Paris Basin",
                    "subregion": "Western Europe",
                    "longitude": "2.312458000000",
                    "latitude": "48.866111000000",
                    "capital_city": "Paris",
                    "nga_code": "FR",
                    "fao_country": "France",
                    "world_region": "Europe"
                },
                "home_seshat_region": {
                    "id": 20,
                    "name": "Western Europe",
                    "subregions_list": "British Isles, France, Low Countries",
                    "mac_region": {
                        "id": 5,
                        "name": "Europe"
                    }
                },
                "private_comment_n": {
                    "id": 1,
                    "text": "NO_PRIVATE_COMMENTS"
                }
            },
            "comment": null,
            "private_comment": {
                "id": 1,
                "text": "NO_PRIVATE_COMMENTS"
            },
            "citations": [],
            "curator": []
        },
        {
            "id": 202,
            "year_from": 1621,
            "year_to": 1667,
            "description": "‘‘‘ The 1668 and 1678 decrees that Muslims, Jews and Christians live separately may also imply corresponding restrictions on conversion. \"It was in response to this situation that a religious council convened by the Emperor Yohannes I in 1668 decreed that 'the Afreng [i.e., Franks] must return to their country and leave ours; but those who have joined our faith and have received our baptism and eucharist can remain here with us or leave if they wish. As for the Muslims, they must remain separate and live apart, forming a separate village of their own; no Christians may enter their service, neither as a slave nor servant, neither husband nor wife may live with them. The Falasa, called Kayla, who are of the Jewish religion, must not live with the Christians, but must separate themselves from them and live apart, forming a village.' Despite this pronouncement, the separation between the groups was only partially implemented, so that a decade later in 1678 Yohannes found it necessary to repeat the decree.\" §REF§(Kaplan 1992: 103-104) Seshat URL: <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/PT9MJQBE\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"fw-bolder\"> <b> Zotero link: PT9MJQBE </b></a>§REF§",
            "note": null,
            "finalized": true,
            "created_date": null,
            "modified_date": "2024-02-19T11:08:17.443095Z",
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "expert_reviewed": false,
            "drb_reviewed": false,
            "name": "Government restrictions on conversion",
            "coded_value": "present",
            "polity": {
                "id": 789,
                "name": "et_ethiopian_k_2",
                "start_year": 1621,
                "end_year": 1768,
                "long_name": "Ethiopia Kingdom II",
                "new_name": "et_ethiopian_k_2",
                "polity_tag": "OTHER_TAG",
                "general_description": "",
                "shapefile_name": null,
                "private_comment": "",
                "created_date": "2023-12-07T16:10:22.768317Z",
                "modified_date": "2023-12-07T16:10:22.768332Z",
                "home_nga": null,
                "home_seshat_region": {
                    "id": 2,
                    "name": "East Africa",
                    "subregions_list": "Tanzania, Burundi, Uganda, So Sudan, Somalia, Ethiopia, Eritrea",
                    "mac_region": {
                        "id": 2,
                        "name": "Africa"
                    }
                },
                "private_comment_n": {
                    "id": 1,
                    "text": "NO_PRIVATE_COMMENTS"
                }
            },
            "comment": null,
            "private_comment": {
                "id": 1,
                "text": "NO_PRIVATE_COMMENTS"
            },
            "citations": [],
            "curator": []
        },
        {
            "id": 75,
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "description": "The following quote suggests that social organisation was sufficiently loose and small in scale that this was variable was likely absent. \"[T]he wider evidence from archaeology[...] suggests these early communities probably consisted of dispersed networks of homesteads, rather than centralised societies (Reid 1994/5; Van Grunderbeek et al. 1983).\"§REF§(Ashley 2010: 146) Seshat URL: <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/ZBIZGHGA\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"fw-bolder\"> <b> Zotero link: ZBIZGHGA </b></a>.§REF§",
            "note": null,
            "finalized": true,
            "created_date": null,
            "modified_date": "2023-12-14T18:16:04.190628Z",
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "expert_reviewed": false,
            "drb_reviewed": false,
            "name": "Government restrictions on conversion",
            "coded_value": "absent",
            "polity": {
                "id": 715,
                "name": "tz_east_africa_ia_1",
                "start_year": 200,
                "end_year": 499,
                "long_name": "Early East Africa Iron Age",
                "new_name": "tz_east_africa_ia_1",
                "polity_tag": "OTHER_TAG",
                "general_description": null,
                "shapefile_name": null,
                "private_comment": null,
                "created_date": null,
                "modified_date": null,
                "home_nga": null,
                "home_seshat_region": {
                    "id": 2,
                    "name": "East Africa",
                    "subregions_list": "Tanzania, Burundi, Uganda, So Sudan, Somalia, Ethiopia, Eritrea",
                    "mac_region": {
                        "id": 2,
                        "name": "Africa"
                    }
                },
                "private_comment_n": {
                    "id": 1,
                    "text": "NO_PRIVATE_COMMENTS"
                }
            },
            "comment": null,
            "private_comment": {
                "id": 1,
                "text": "NO_PRIVATE_COMMENTS"
            },
            "citations": [],
            "curator": []
        },
        {
            "id": 300,
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "description": "‘‘‘ “Not until the destruction of the Temple in AD 70, and after a temporary reduction to the status of dediticii brought about by their revolt, was Judaism opened to Roman citizens and then only to born Jews. ” §REF§ (Guterman 1971, 12) Guterman, Simeon. 1971. Religious Toleration and Persecution in ancient Rome. London: Aiglion Press. Seshat URL: <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/DGNRK6XG\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"fw-bolder\"> <b> Zotero link: DGNRK6XG </b></a>§REF§“The basis for the continuity in the Roman attitude toward foreign religions under the Republic and the Empire lay in the exigencies of the Roman citizenship and the civic religion. Roman citizenship was exclusive, that is, incompatible with the exercise of another citizenship. The official Roman cult was exclusive; membership in a foreign and unauthorized religion was barred to Roman citizens. ‘Every state has its own cult, Laelius; we have ours,’ says Cicero.” §REF§ (Guterman 1971, 12) Guterman, Simeon. 1971. Religious Toleration and Persecution in ancient Rome. London: Aiglion Press. Seshat URL: <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/DGNRK6XG\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"fw-bolder\"> <b> Zotero link: DGNRK6XG </b></a>§REF§",
            "note": null,
            "finalized": true,
            "created_date": null,
            "modified_date": "2023-12-13T14:47:25.205952Z",
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "expert_reviewed": false,
            "drb_reviewed": false,
            "name": "Government restrictions on conversion",
            "coded_value": "present",
            "polity": {
                "id": 184,
                "name": "ItRomLR",
                "start_year": -133,
                "end_year": -31,
                "long_name": "Late Roman Republic",
                "new_name": "it_roman_rep_3",
                "polity_tag": "LEGACY",
                "general_description": "The last of the Roman kings, the tyrannical Lucius Tarquinius Superbus ('the Arrogant'), was expelled by a revolt of some of the leading Roman aristocrats in 509 BCE. Vowing never again to allow a single person to amass so much authority, the revolutionaries established in place of the monarchy a republican system of governance, featuring a senate composed of aristocratic men and a series of elected political and military officials. The Roman Republic was a remarkably stable and successful polity, lasting from 509 BCE until it was transformed into an imperial state under Augustus in 31 BCE (though the exact date is debated, as this was not a formal transformation). We divide the Republic into an early (509-264 BCE), a middle (264-133 BCE), and a late (133-31 BCE) period.<br>The Late Republican period began once Rome was firmly established as the major power throughout the Mediterranean basin. By the end of the period, Romans had taken control of the entire Mediterranean region, with further territorial expansion into North Africa, Anatolia, the Levant and Egypt. Success abroad, however, was not matched by stability at home. The Roman state entered a prolonged period of crisis during the 1st century BCE. Civil wars were frequent, pitting different military leaders such as Sulla, Pompey the Great, and Julius Caesar and their supporters against each other. An underlying tension persisted between the wealthy and elite and the rest of the population. These tensions intensified in 133 BCE, when a Plebeian Tribune (an elected official charged with looking after the interests of the poorer members of society) named Tiberius Gracchus proposed legislation to redistribute land that had been taken over (legally and extra-legally) by wealthy aristocrats to landless Romans, particularly those who had served in the army. This move upset the ruling elite, leading to a riot in the streets of Rome and, ultimately, to Gracchus' death. The city's different political factions were polarized by these events, leading to a series of violent contests for power by military leaders supported either by the elites (notably Sulla and Pompey the Great) or styled as champions of the people (Marius, Caesar, and Octavian/Augustus).<br>The period of civil war, and with it republican government at Rome, effectively ended in 31 BCE when Octavian (soon to take the title of Augustus as the first ruler of the imperial Roman state, known as the Principate) defeated Mark Antony and the Egyptian army led by the Ptolemaic Queen Cleopatra at the battle of Actium.<br><i>Population and political organization</i><br>Rome during the Republican period possessed no written constitution, but was governed largely through the power and prestige of the Senate, with a clear respect for precedent and for maintaining Rome's traditions. §REF§ (Brennan 2004, 31) Corey T. Brennan. 2004. 'Power and Process under the Republican \"Constitution\"', in <i>The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic</i>, edited by Harriet I. Flower, 31-65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. §REF§  A primary goal of the early Republic was to establish clear checks on the power of any single ruler - the military office of chief commander was in fact split between two generals (consuls), while the chief priestly and legislative posts were split among different people (individuals were restricted from holding multiple offices at once) - and popular assemblies voted on new laws.<br>Romans of this period did not distinguish between what is today termed 'secular' and 'sacred' authority; although individual magistracies had distinct functions, the same person often held both religious and political offices over the course of their lifetime, as they were thought to be part of essentially the same sphere of governance. The Republic featured a substantial array of religious offices and institutions intended to determine the will of the gods or to please them through the proper performance of rituals and the maintenance of large public temples. §REF§ (Brennan 2004, 37) Corey T. Brennan. 2004. 'Power and Process under the Republican \"Constitution\"', in <i>The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic</i>, edited by Harriet I. Flower, 31-65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. §REF§  These public auspices were the basis of magisterial power in the Republic. §REF§ (Brennan 2004, 37) Corey T. Brennan. 2004. 'Power and Process under the Republican \"Constitution\"', in <i>The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic</i>, edited by Harriet I. Flower, 31-65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. §REF§  Auspices were sometimes taken by consuls and other officials, for example before important military engagements, §REF§ (Brennan 2004, 37) Corey T. Brennan. 2004. 'Power and Process under the Republican \"Constitution\"', in <i>The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic</i>, edited by Harriet I. Flower, 31-65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. §REF§  but were mainly managed by specialist elected priests and full-time priestesses (such as the Vestal Virgins) and other priestly offices supported by the state. §REF§ (Culham 2004, 131) Phyllis Culham. 2004. 'Women in the Roman Republic, in <i>The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic</i>, edited by Harriet I. Flower, 139-59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. §REF§ <br>Despite the internal strife, Rome remained essentially unchallenged by external forces and continued to make military advances. The significant reforms of the consul Marius helped modernize the ever-expanding Roman army around 105 BCE by removing property qualifications for military service, paving the way towards a fully professional fighting force. The period also saw some extensive engineering projects that increased urbanization and economic development: roads, aqueducts, bridges, amphitheatres, theatres, public baths, as well as Roman administrative and legal institutions spread alongside the military throughout the Mediterranean. Though this time was a period of political instability, it also was the start of a 'golden age' in the cultural history of Rome, with literary figures like Cicero, Horace, Sallust, Caesar and Catullus, among others, leaving important and influential writings.<br>The population at the dawn of empire was around 30 million people, with Italy itself supporting between 5 and 10 million, thus apparently experiencing population growth despite the repeated bouts of civil war. §REF§ (Scheidel 2008) Walter Scheidel. 2008. 'Roman Population Size: The Logic of the Debate', in <i>People, Land, and Politics: Demographic Developments and the Transformation of Roman Italy, 300 BC-AD 14</i>, edited by L. de Ligt and S. J. Northwood, 17-70. Leiden: Brill. §REF§ ",
                "shapefile_name": null,
                "private_comment": null,
                "created_date": null,
                "modified_date": null,
                "home_nga": {
                    "id": 1,
                    "name": "Latium",
                    "subregion": "Southern Europe",
                    "longitude": "12.486948000000",
                    "latitude": "41.890407000000",
                    "capital_city": "Rome",
                    "nga_code": "IT",
                    "fao_country": "Italy",
                    "world_region": "Europe"
                },
                "home_seshat_region": {
                    "id": 18,
                    "name": "Southern Europe",
                    "subregions_list": "Iberia, Italy",
                    "mac_region": {
                        "id": 5,
                        "name": "Europe"
                    }
                },
                "private_comment_n": {
                    "id": 1,
                    "text": "NO_PRIVATE_COMMENTS"
                }
            },
            "comment": null,
            "private_comment": {
                "id": 1,
                "text": "NO_PRIVATE_COMMENTS"
            },
            "citations": [],
            "curator": []
        },
        {
            "id": 25,
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "description": "“Many scholars have felt impelled to emphasise the toleration of different sects and denominations evinced by Indian rulers. [...] It seems fairly clear that, traditionally in India, people readily transferred or distributed their allegiance between different sects, seeing no logical inconsistency in approaching different gods for different purposes, and that this apparently syncretic style of religious behaviour encouraged a relaxed attitude to what others did as well; evidently, too, rulers generally extended their acceptance of this practice. [...] Much of the evidence, then, suggests that all the diverse religious sects were freely tolerated by a prevailing world view that was ready to acknowledge a certain common validity. Yet it is unlikely that such a view could rise to the status of cultural orthodoxy without friction. Although references to religious wars and persecutions are conspicuously absent from the historical record of ancient India, this does not rule out lesser types of conflict, and some scholars believe that there is indeed evidence of localised disagreement and resentment. [...] For example, the Arthaśāstra gratuitously advises the agents of a king to help themselves, on behalf of the ruler, to the property of groups on the fringes of society who might not have powerful friends. Moreover, there are hints in scattered sources that the followers of orthodox Brahman teachers at times ganged up against Buddhist or Jain establishments that had lost their former patronage. [...] Still, hard evidence of religious persecution in these ancient times is scattered and fragmentary. In the absence of more solid evidence, the view has gained ground that pre-modern India had a cultural unity that precluded communal conflict, but we think that this picture is not sufficiently nuanced. Doniger’s perception that there was widespread persecution of non-Brahmans during the first millennium may fairly represent the situation that arose at certain times, but we cannot be at all sure how widespread the phenomenon was, or at what times it was most marked.//\"Still, we should note that, simply as a matter of practical politics, there was at least one factor that would certainly have acted to limit the ferocity of any sectarian persecutions – the absence of a clear and powerful advantage at all times for kings in identifying themselves with the Brahman interest. No clear dividing line existed, in fact, between ruling families that were of ‘genuine’ ‘Aryan’ descent, and the rest; the ruling elite presided over heterogeneous populations within which Brahmanism, as an agent of Sanskritisation and as a common cultural denominator, was slowly feeling its way towards a new role, directed towards shaping an inclusive syncretism. Thus, the Brahmanical revival could not afford to go too far. Especially, it had to be very wary of attacking the prudent preference of kings for policies that had the capacity to attract wide support among the multiple disparate groups that constituted the citizenry. The Brahmans had to make do with whatever qualified honour they could find within the frame of an eclectic culture. Such structural constraints are likely to have kept them from striking at their enemies too wantonly.”§REF§(Copland, Mabbett, Roy, Brittlebank and Bowles 2012: 74-77) Seshat URL: <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/ATSZ6QBU\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"fw-bolder\"> <b> Zotero link: ATSZ6QBU </b></a>§REF§",
            "note": null,
            "finalized": false,
            "created_date": null,
            "modified_date": "2024-06-11T15:17:37.768318Z",
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "expert_reviewed": false,
            "drb_reviewed": false,
            "name": "Government restrictions on conversion",
            "coded_value": "absent",
            "polity": {
                "id": 418,
                "name": "in_gurjara_pratihara_dyn",
                "start_year": 730,
                "end_year": 1030,
                "long_name": "Gurjar-Pratihara Dynasty",
                "new_name": "in_gurjara_pratihara_dyn",
                "polity_tag": "LEGACY",
                "general_description": "The polity of Gurjar ran from c. 730 to 1030 CE with its territory spanning approximately 1 million square kilometres; roughly corresponding to a slightly smaller area than the states of Gujarat, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Bihar combined. §REF§ (Keay 2000: 198) Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/HSHAKZ3X\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/HSHAKZ3X</a>. §REF§ <br>There has been no information could be found in the sources consulted regarding the polity's overall population, but the imperial capital of Kanauj is thought to have had a population of 80,000 people at its peak in 810 - 950 CE.",
                "shapefile_name": null,
                "private_comment": "JR: Changed start year from 810 to 730 CE -- now matches the date range for ruler transitions.",
                "created_date": null,
                "modified_date": "2024-06-11T12:26:04.458158Z",
                "home_nga": {
                    "id": 14,
                    "name": "Middle Ganga",
                    "subregion": "Indo-Gangetic Plain",
                    "longitude": "82.700000000000",
                    "latitude": "25.750000000000",
                    "capital_city": "Jaunpur",
                    "nga_code": "UTPR",
                    "fao_country": "India",
                    "world_region": "South Asia"
                },
                "home_seshat_region": {
                    "id": 40,
                    "name": "Southern South Asia",
                    "subregions_list": "Southern India and Sri Lanka",
                    "mac_region": {
                        "id": 9,
                        "name": "South Asia"
                    }
                },
                "private_comment_n": {
                    "id": 57,
                    "text": "a new_private_comment_text new approach for polity"
                }
            },
            "comment": null,
            "private_comment": {
                "id": 1,
                "text": "NO_PRIVATE_COMMENTS"
            },
            "citations": [],
            "curator": []
        },
        {
            "id": 265,
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "description": "‘‘‘ “There were certainly dissident religious groups in the countryside, such as the Turlupins who roamed western France in the late fourteenth century preaching polygamy and equal distribution of wealth (at least until the authorities caught up with them). But catharism, still present in the countryside at the start of our period, faded from view, perhaps finding a last hiding place among some southern confraternities. The Vaudois (as Gabriel Audisio has shown) migrated from west to east, the last remaining groups in Gascony dwindling away as centres in Luberon and Dauphiné became the most prominent.” §REF§ Small, G. 2009. Late Medieval France. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Pg 93. Seshat URL: <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/J8FTT66Z\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"fw-bolder\"> <b> Zotero link: J8FTT66Z </b></a> §REF§\r\n\r\n\"Yes, in certain periods for the Jewish population, and certainly for religious heretic groups.\"§REF§(Susan Broomhall, 2023, pers. comm.)§REF§",
            "note": null,
            "finalized": true,
            "created_date": null,
            "modified_date": "2024-02-15T11:42:34.494232Z",
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "expert_reviewed": true,
            "drb_reviewed": false,
            "name": "Government restrictions on conversion",
            "coded_value": "present",
            "polity": {
                "id": 333,
                "name": "FrValoE",
                "start_year": 1328,
                "end_year": 1450,
                "long_name": "French Kingdom - Early Valois",
                "new_name": "fr_valois_k_1",
                "polity_tag": "LEGACY",
                "general_description": "The French crown passed to the Valois Dynasty in 1328 after a succession crisis within the ruling Capetian family, and the Valois reigned over the French kingdom until 1589 CE. Here we focus on the early Valois period, 1328-1450 CE, which was marked by the Hundred Years' War and the economic and human devastation caused by the Black Death. By the mid-15th century, the beginnings of a more modern bureaucracy had developed under Charles VII.<br>In this period, the territory of the Kingdom of France was considerably smaller than that of modern France. §REF§ (Knecht 2004, 2) Knecht, Robert J. 2004. The Valois: Kings of France 1328-1589. London: Hambledon and London. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/JBFZ35AI\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/JBFZ35AI</a>. §REF§  The kingdom covered 390,000 square kilometres in 1350 and 340,000 square kilometres in 1450. §REF§  (Turchin and Nefedov 2009, 113) Turchin, Peter and Sergey Nefedov. 2009. Secular Cycles. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/7MDE5MUH\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/7MDE5MUH</a>. §REF§ <br>In response to the decline in population and production during the Black Death in the mid-fourteenth century, the crown instituted harsh financial reforms and higher taxes. This led to revolts by peasants and in urban areas. §REF§  (Haine 2000, 44) Haine, W. Scott. 2000. The History of France. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/9RS462P7\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/9RS462P7</a>  §REF§  At the same time, the Valois faced the English Plantagenet dynasty in the Hundred Years’ War (1337-1453 CE). The French suffered major defeats at Bruges (1340 CE) and Agincourt (1415 CE). Historian of France W. Scott Haine notes that, “In the darkest days of this war France’s very existence seemed in question.” §REF§  (Haine 2000, 44) Haine, W. Scott. 2000. The History of France. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/9RS462P7\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/9RS462P7</a>  §REF§   In 1439 CE, inspired by the actions of peasant leader Joan of Arc, Charles VII of France instituted a professional standing army. §REF§  (Haine 2000, 45) Haine, W. Scott. 2000. The History of France. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/9RS462P7\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/9RS462P7</a>  §REF§   Charles VII conquered Normandy and Aquitaine by 1453 CE, and England only maintained control over Calais.<br><i>Population and political organization</i><br>We have estimated the population of the French Kingdom as 12 million in 1350 CE using data from Turchin and Nefedov’s <i>Secular Cycles.</i> §REF§  (Turchin and Nefedov 2009, 113) Turchin, Peter and Sergey Nefedov. 2009. Secular Cycles. Princeton: Princeton, University Press. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/7MDE5MUH/\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/7MDE5MUH/</a>  §REF§  The population declined drastically during the Black Plague in the mid-fourteenth century. §REF§  (Knecth 2004, 2) Knecht. Robert. 2004. The Valois: Kings of France 1328-1589. London: Hambledon Continuum. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/JBFZ35AI\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/JBFZ35AI</a>  §REF§  An estimated one-third of population died in the plague by 1400 CE. §REF§  (Haine 2000, 44) Haine, W. Scott. 2000. The History of France. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/9RS462P7\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/9RS462P7</a>  §REF§   In 1450 CE, the population was only 9 million. §REF§  (Turchin and Nefedov 2009, 113) Turchin, Peter and Sergey Nefedov. 2009. Secular Cycles. Princeton: Princeton, University Press. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/7MDE5MUH/\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/7MDE5MUH/</a>  §REF§ <br>The king and royal lineage dominated French political society. Others were divided into estates: the clergy, the nobles, and the common people. §REF§  (Knecth 2004, 8) Knecht. Robert. 2004. The Valois: Kings of France 1328-1589. London: Hambledon Continuum. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/JBFZ35AI\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/JBFZ35AI</a>  §REF§  During the time of the Valois there were 40,000 noble families in France- nobility was either inherited or bestowed by the king. §REF§  (Knecth 2004, 8) Knecht. Robert. 2004. The Valois: Kings of France 1328-1589. London: Hambledon Continuum. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/JBFZ35AI\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/JBFZ35AI</a>  §REF§  Charles VII (1422-1461 CE) began the process to modernize the crown- instituting reforms to change the government from feudal to bureaucratic. This was continued by Late Valois ruler Louis XI (1461-1483 CE). §REF§  (Haine 2000, 46) Haine, W. Scott. 2000. The History of France. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/9RS462P7\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/9RS462P7</a>  §REF§ ",
                "shapefile_name": null,
                "private_comment": null,
                "created_date": null,
                "modified_date": null,
                "home_nga": {
                    "id": 2,
                    "name": "Paris Basin",
                    "subregion": "Western Europe",
                    "longitude": "2.312458000000",
                    "latitude": "48.866111000000",
                    "capital_city": "Paris",
                    "nga_code": "FR",
                    "fao_country": "France",
                    "world_region": "Europe"
                },
                "home_seshat_region": {
                    "id": 20,
                    "name": "Western Europe",
                    "subregions_list": "British Isles, France, Low Countries",
                    "mac_region": {
                        "id": 5,
                        "name": "Europe"
                    }
                },
                "private_comment_n": {
                    "id": 1,
                    "text": "NO_PRIVATE_COMMENTS"
                }
            },
            "comment": null,
            "private_comment": {
                "id": 1,
                "text": "NO_PRIVATE_COMMENTS"
            },
            "citations": [],
            "curator": []
        },
        {
            "id": 327,
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "description": "",
            "note": null,
            "finalized": false,
            "created_date": "2024-06-10T10:32:52.403421Z",
            "modified_date": "2024-06-13T09:39:55.108602Z",
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "expert_reviewed": true,
            "drb_reviewed": false,
            "name": "Gov_res_conv",
            "coded_value": "absent",
            "polity": {
                "id": 16,
                "name": "MxAztec",
                "start_year": 1427,
                "end_year": 1526,
                "long_name": "Aztec Empire",
                "new_name": "mx_aztec_emp",
                "polity_tag": "LEGACY",
                "general_description": "The Basin or Valley of Mexico is a highlands plateau in central Mexico roughly corresponding to modern-day Mexico City. Here, we are interested in the phase of its prehistory known as the Late Postclassic period, when the Aztecs or Mexica rose to power (c. 1427-1526 CE). The Aztec Empire was born from the \"Triple Alliance\" between the city-states (altepetl) of Tenochtitlan, Texcoco, and Tlacopan, who agreed to collaborate on campaign of territorial expansion and share the resulting tribute and tax payments. §REF§ (Smith and Sergheraert 2012: 449-451) Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/XC9E2B7Q\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/XC9E2B7Q</a>. §REF§  Within a century, the three cities came to control a significant portion of Northern Mesoamerica, the main exception being the West, which, despite some military successes on the part of the Triple Alliance early on, largely remained under the control of the Tarascans. §REF§ (Evans 2012: 125) Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/AN5IUQ7X\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/AN5IUQ7X</a>. §REF§ <br>As the empire grew, so did the power of Tenochtitlan, which became the de-facto administrative capital, whose ruler came to hold the title huey tlatoani (“high king”). Tenochtitlan's power was strongest over the empire's central provinces, where the Aztecs ruled through governors, judges, tax collectors and other officials that they appointed themselves. For the \"outer\" provinces, the Aztecs limited themselves to targeting major centres, where, again, they appointed their governors and administrative officials. Finally, the Aztecs secured their power over \"frontier\" provinces by guaranteeing military protection from external foes, in exchange for \"gifts\" of soldiers and prestige goods. §REF§ (Smith and Sergheraert 2012: 455-457) Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/XC9E2B7Q\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/XC9E2B7Q</a>. §REF§ <br>By the time of Spanish conquest in the 1520s, Tenochtitlan likely housed between 150,000 and 250,000 people, §REF§ (Carballo 2019: pers. comm. to E. Cioni and G. Nazzaro) §REF§  perhaps even 3,000. §REF§ (De Rioja 2017: 220) Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/GC3T83JD\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/GC3T83JD</a>. §REF§ ",
                "shapefile_name": null,
                "private_comment": null,
                "created_date": null,
                "modified_date": null,
                "home_nga": {
                    "id": 27,
                    "name": "Basin of Mexico",
                    "subregion": "Mexico",
                    "longitude": "-99.130000000000",
                    "latitude": "19.430000000000",
                    "capital_city": "Ciudad de Mexico",
                    "nga_code": "MX",
                    "fao_country": "Mexico",
                    "world_region": "North America"
                },
                "home_seshat_region": {
                    "id": 23,
                    "name": "Mexico",
                    "subregions_list": "Mexico",
                    "mac_region": {
                        "id": 7,
                        "name": "North America"
                    }
                },
                "private_comment_n": {
                    "id": 1,
                    "text": "NO_PRIVATE_COMMENTS"
                }
            },
            "comment": {
                "id": 68,
                "text": "a new_comment_text"
            },
            "private_comment": null,
            "citations": [],
            "curator": []
        },
        {
            "id": 324,
            "year_from": 1846,
            "year_to": 1860,
            "description": "‘‘‘ \"In 1724, the Yongzheng Emperor (reigned 1722–1735) issued a formal prohibition against the propagation of the Catholic faith in the provinces. All churches were closed and followers were ordered to renounce their faith. Adopting a policy similar to that of his predecessor, the Qianlong Emperor (reigned 1735–1796) continued to ban the missionaries from entering China. In 1746, foreign missionaries were found ministering to Chinese Catholics in Fuan, Fujian province. The emperor went so far as to order all local officials to expel or execute anyone preaching or embracing Catholicism. This was followed by the persecution of the Chinese Catholics, the population of which was steadily increasing during his entire reign. In 1757, the Qianlong Emperor confined all foreign maritime trade to Canton (Guangzhou) and required each and every arriving Western vessel to be supervised by a Chinese mercantile house. Under these circumstances, it became more difficult for foreign missionaries to preach or perform priesthood duties in local communities. Many church activities were forced to cease or be driven underground.\" (Lai and Wu 2019: 4) However, Christian missionaires were allowed to proselytise in 1860: “Further fomenting public anger was the presence of foreign missionaries, who in 1860 had gained the right to proselytize and build churches throughout the empire.” §REF§ (Xiong and Hammond 2019, 313) Xiong, Victor Cunrui and Kenneth J. Hammond. 2019. Routledge Handbook of Imperial Chinese History. London and New York: Routledge. Seshat URL: <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/9RC9JSM7\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"fw-bolder\"> <b> Zotero link: 9RC9JSM7 </b></a> §REF§“After the Opium War, the ban on Christianity in China began to change. In 1844, after the First Opium War, the French envoy, Joseph Théodose Marie Melchior de Lagrené, proposed the abolition of the ban on Catholicism. Following negotiations, Emperor Daoguang issued an edict stating, \"In the future, whether domestic or foreign, anyone who studies and adheres to Catholicism in accordance with the rules shall not be punished.\" Foreign missionaries were “only permitted to build churches for worship in the treaty ports and were forbidden from preaching in the interior of the country. ” … On November 6th, Daoguang approved the statement that \"Catholicism is revered in this country and is not regarded as a heretical religion in China. The reason for punishing those who use religion for evil is due to the misuse of religion by Chinese believers, not because of a ban on the Chinese people's veneration of it.\" The court's intention was clear: to regulate the Chinese, but not foreigners' religious beliefs in China. The doors of Christianity remained closed to the Chinese people … In late 1844, copies of the edict were circulated by Qiying to various regions to inform officials to exempt priests and believers from punishment. On March 18, 1846, the edict was publicly announced in Guangzhou, and the lifting of the ban on Christianity became official. Christian missionary work required an audience, and for the general Chinese population, the true meaning of the lifting of the ban began at this time. (鸦片战争后,禁教局面开始改变。道光二十四年(1844年),中法战争之后,法国公使喇萼呢提出废除对天主教的禁令。经谈判,道光皇帝发布谕旨:“嗣后无论中外民人,凡有学习信奉天主教而循规蹈矩者,毫无查禁,皆免惩治”。外国传教士“只准其在通商口岸建堂礼拜,不得擅入内地传教”……11月6日,道光批复“天主教系该国所崇奉,中国并不斥为邪教,实因我国习教之人借教为恶,是以惩治其罪,并非禁该国人崇奉也”。朝廷的意思很清楚,只查中国人信教,不管在华外人的信教,基督的大门仍不准向中国人自由开放……1844年底,耆英曾将弛禁文件抄送各地,通知对教士教民免于治罪,划一办理。1846年3月18日,耆英在广州公布弛禁上谕, 解除教禁的政令至此公开化。传教需有受众,对一般中国人来说,真正意义上的弛禁是从这时开始。)” §REF§Liu, Yuan. (2016). “Negotiations between Gentry and the Qing Dynasty on the Huantang Cases: A Case Study of the Nanyang Huantang Case.” Phase Results of \"Local Gentry in Hubei Education Cases in Late Qing Dynasty (1860-1911)\" Humanities and Social Sciences Project of Hubei Provincial Department of Education. §REF§  “During the Qing Dynasty, although the ban on Christianity had been lifted, the authorities still occasionally repress on those who practiced the religion. In the third year of the Xianfeng reign (1853), the governor of Zhili Province, Naeljing'a, reported that there were 80 Christian households in Jianjiazhuang, Ansui County, and the Xianfeng Emperor ordered a thorough investigation, which resulted in the imprisonment of many people. In the fifth year of the Xianfeng reign (1855), a Catholic named Qiu Yunting from Nanhai County, Guangdong Province, went to Tianjin to \"practice medicine and treat illnesses,\" but he was arrested by the authorities in the ninth year of the Xianfeng reign (1859). In addition, during this period, there were also three cases in Fuzhou in which Christians were targeted and persecuted. (清廷虽已弛禁基督教, 但仍不时打击习教百姓。咸丰三年, 直隶总督讷尔经额奏报安肃县尖家庄习教者达80户, 咸丰帝下令严查, 结果多人被下狱。咸丰五年, 广东南海县天主教民邱云亭潜入天津 “行医治病” , 咸丰九年被官府查获。 此外, 这一时期福州也发生了3起打击教民之事。)” §REF§Zhao, Shuhao. \"A New Exploration of Qing Government's Christian Policies during the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom Period.\" Historical Archives 4 (2009): 47-52. §REF§ “In 1856-1860, the Second Opium War erupted, and China was defeated again, signing the unequal treaties of the Treaty of Tianjin and the Treaty of Beijing with the Great Britain and France, respectively. The Treaty of Tianjin in 1858 allowed British, French, and other nationals to travel, trade, and freely preach in the interior of China. The Treaty of Beijing in 1860 stipulated the return of confiscated Catholic Church property and allowed French missionaries to \"rent land and build churches at their discretion\" in various provinces. Thus, the ban on Christianity implemented since the Kangxi reign was eroded under the coercion of Western powers.(1856-1860年又爆发了第二次鸦片战争,中国再次战败,与英法签订了《天津条约》《北京条约》 等不平等条约。1858年的 《天津条约》 规定英、法等国人可往内地游历、通商、自由传教。1860年的《北京条约》中规定退还以前没收的天主堂资产,法国还擅自在中文约本上增加:“并任法国传教士在各省租买田地,建造自便。” 这样一来,康熙年间开始的禁教政策就在西方列强的强迫下瓦解了。)” §REF§ Ding, Li. (2011). The development of Christianity in China since modern times. Theory Horizon, 11(458), 103-106. §REF§",
            "note": null,
            "finalized": true,
            "created_date": "2023-12-11T17:02:42.694061Z",
            "modified_date": "2023-12-11T17:02:42.694073Z",
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "expert_reviewed": true,
            "drb_reviewed": false,
            "name": "Gov_res_conv",
            "coded_value": "P~A",
            "polity": {
                "id": 2,
                "name": "CnQingL",
                "start_year": 1796,
                "end_year": 1912,
                "long_name": "Late Qing",
                "new_name": "cn_qing_dyn_2",
                "polity_tag": "LEGACY",
                "general_description": "The Qing Dynasty (or Empire of the Great Qing, Great Qing, Manchu Dynasty, Manchus, Jin, Jurchens, Ch'ing Dynasty) was China's last imperial dynasty. The founders of the Qing were descendants of Jurchen Jin rulers. The dynasty was founded by Nurhaci and then led by his son Huang Taiji, but did not become an imperial Chinese dynasty until after Huang Taiji's death. §REF§ (San 2014, 337-38) Tan Koon San. 2014. <i>Dynastic China: An Elementary History</i>. Malaysia: The Other Press Sdn. Bhd. §REF§  In 1644 CE, Qing forces captured the Ming capital at Beijing from rebels and held a funeral for the last Ming emperor to symbolize Qing inheritance of the Mandate of Heaven. §REF§ (San 2014, 338) Tan Koon San. 2014. <i>Dynastic China: An Elementary History</i>. Malaysia: The Other Press Sdn. Bhd. §REF§ <br>The Qing faced conflict with rebels and loyalist Ming forces for the next two decades. §REF§ (San 2014, 337-38) Tan Koon San. 2014. <i>Dynastic China: An Elementary History</i>. Malaysia: The Other Press Sdn. Bhd. §REF§  Ming generals who surrendered were given power over large territories in southern China in exchange for loyalty to the Qing. In 1673 CE, leaders from three major southern feudatories led by Wu Sangui rebelled against Emperor Kangxi when he tried to reduce their power. §REF§ (San 2014, 385) Tan Koon San. 2014. <i>Dynastic China: An Elementary History</i>. Malaysia: The Other Press Sdn. Bhd. §REF§  The Revolt of the Three Feudatories, as this episode is known, lasted eight years.<br>We divide the Qing Dynasty into two, an Early period (1644-1796 CE) and a Late period (1796-1912 CE). The division is marked by a period of internal turmoil as well as foreign incursions into its territory and economic sphere. In the Early Qing period, China had been prosperous under Kangxi and Qing rule, but by the time of the Opium Wars in the Late Qing, Western technology and industry had surpassed that of China. §REF§ (Mao 2005, 8) Haijin Mao. 2005. <i>The Qing Empire and the Opium War: The Collapse of the Heavenly Dynasty</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. §REF§  The fall of the Qing Dynasty in 1911 gave rise to the Republic of China.<br>From 1850 to 1864 CE, China was racked by the fourteen-year Taiping Rebellion. The rebellion directly caused 30 million deaths and destroyed many regions in the middle and lower Yangtze. §REF§ (Rowe 2009, 198) William T. Rowe. 2009. <i>China's Last Empire: The Great Qing</i>. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. §REF§  In 1853, the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom of Great Peace established a capital in Nanjing, but the rebellion was defeated by armies led by local governors in 1864. §REF§ (Theobald 2000) Theobald Ulrich. 2000. 'Qing Period Event History'. <i>Chinaknowledge.de</i>. <a class=\"external free\" href=\"http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html</a>. Accessed 21 March 2017. §REF§  A number of serious uprisings followed the Taiping Rebellion, including the Nian Rebellion (1853-1868 CE). §REF§ (Theobald 2000) Theobald Ulrich. 2000. 'Qing Period Event History'. <i>Chinaknowledge.de</i>. <a class=\"external free\" href=\"http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html</a>. Accessed 21 March 2017. §REF§ <br>At the same time, the Qing emperors were facing economic problems due to the actions of foreign powers. In the 1830s, British merchants began illegally importing opium to China, where high demand for the drug led to a large trade imbalance. China's economy was drained of silver §REF§ (Rowe 2009, 157) William T. Rowe. 2009. <i>China's Last Empire: The Great Qing</i>. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. §REF§  and the value of copper coins depreciated. §REF§ (Theobald 2000) Theobald Ulrich. 2000. 'Qing Period Event History'. <i>Chinaknowledge.de</i>. <a class=\"external free\" href=\"http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html</a>. Accessed 21 March 2017. §REF§  The First Opium War broke out in 1839 CE when a Chinese commissioner attempted to block opium trade in Guangzhou harbour. §REF§ (Theobald 2000) Theobald Ulrich. 2000. 'Qing Period Event History'. <i>Chinaknowledge.de</i>. <a class=\"external free\" href=\"http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html</a>. Accessed 21 March 2017. §REF§  The Second Opium War of 1858 CE was a series of military actions by the British and French against the Qing. §REF§ (Theobald 2000) Theobald Ulrich. 2000. 'Qing Period Event History'. <i>Chinaknowledge.de</i>. <a class=\"external free\" href=\"http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html</a>. Accessed 21 March 2017. §REF§  The resulting treaties allowed foreign powers to establish concessions in China, abolished taxes for French and British merchants, and forced the Qing to pay large amounts of silver in damages. §REF§ (Theobald 2000) Theobald Ulrich. 2000. 'Qing Period Event History'. <i>Chinaknowledge.de</i>. <a class=\"external free\" href=\"http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html</a>. Accessed 21 March 2017. §REF§ <br>The 19th century saw increasingly frequent intrusions by foreign powers. Foreign merchants exploited their tax-free status, to the detriment of local Chinese producers. China was forced to cede much of its territory in Vietnam, Burma and elsewhere. §REF§ (Theobald 2000) Theobald Ulrich. 2000. 'Qing Period Event History'. <i>Chinaknowledge.de</i>. <a class=\"external free\" href=\"http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html</a>. Accessed 21 March 2017. §REF§  By the end of the 19th century, a range of foreign powers including Great Britain, Japan, Germany, and France claimed colonial territories in China. §REF§ (Theobald 2000) Theobald Ulrich. 2000. 'Qing Period Event History'. <i>Chinaknowledge.de</i>. <a class=\"external free\" href=\"http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html</a>. Accessed 21 March 2017. §REF§  A peasant uprising known as the Boxer Rebellion targeted foreigners in 1900 CE.<br>In 1860, the Qing rulers were exiled outside the Great Wall when foreign invaders burned down the Summer Palace. §REF§ (Rowe 2009, 201) William T. Rowe. 2009. <i>China's Last Empire: The Great Qing</i>. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. §REF§  The court was restored by the regent Empress Dowager Cixi and Prince Gong in what is known as the Tongzhi restoration. §REF§ (Rowe 2009, 201) William T. Rowe. 2009. <i>China's Last Empire: The Great Qing</i>. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. §REF§  However, the dynasty was finally overthrown in the Revolution of 1911 and the Republic of China was founded.<br><i>Population and political organization</i><br>The Late Qing maintained a traditional imperial-style Chinese government headed by an emperor and central bureaucracy. Provincial government consisted of governors who controlled a hierarchical system of officials, prefects, county chiefs, county magistrates, and clerks. §REF§ (Zhang 2011, 63) Wei-Bin Zhang. 2011. <i>The Rise and Fall of China's Last Dynasty: The Deepening of the Chinese Servility</i>. Hauppage, NY: Nova Science Publishers. §REF§  The Qing were deeply opposed to modernization: the scholars Kang Youwei and Liang Qichao had to flee after attempting to reform government practices in 1898 CE. §REF§ (Theobald 2000) Theobald Ulrich. 2000. 'Qing Period Event History'. <i>Chinaknowledge.de</i>. <a class=\"external free\" href=\"http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html</a>. Accessed 21 March 2017. §REF§  Rebellions in the 19th century led to the rise of local governors and military commanders, who acted as warlords to control their local regions. §REF§ (Theobald 2000) Theobald Ulrich. 2000. 'Qing Period Event History'. <i>Chinaknowledge.de</i>. <a class=\"external free\" href=\"http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Qing/qing-event.html</a>. Accessed 21 March 2017. §REF§ <br>The period between the mid-18th and mid-19th centuries was one of extremely rapid population growth in Late Qing China, and by 1851 the population had reached 431.9 million people. §REF§ (Banister 1987, 3-4) Judith Banister. 1987. <i>China's Changing Population</i>. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. §REF§  However, a number of censuses after that date could not be completed due to the rebellions.",
                "shapefile_name": null,
                "private_comment": "",
                "created_date": null,
                "modified_date": "2024-01-17T15:41:02.301719Z",
                "home_nga": {
                    "id": 20,
                    "name": "Middle Yellow River Valley",
                    "subregion": "North China",
                    "longitude": "112.517587000000",
                    "latitude": "34.701825000000",
                    "capital_city": "Luoyang",
                    "nga_code": "CN",
                    "fao_country": "China",
                    "world_region": "East Asia"
                },
                "home_seshat_region": {
                    "id": 58,
                    "name": "North China",
                    "subregions_list": "North China without Tibet, Inner Mongolia, and Xinjiang",
                    "mac_region": {
                        "id": 4,
                        "name": "East Asia"
                    }
                },
                "private_comment_n": {
                    "id": 1,
                    "text": "NO_PRIVATE_COMMENTS"
                }
            },
            "comment": null,
            "private_comment": {
                "id": 1,
                "text": "NO_PRIVATE_COMMENTS"
            },
            "citations": [],
            "curator": []
        },
        {
            "id": 283,
            "year_from": null,
            "year_to": null,
            "description": "“It is extremely difficult to ascertain the precise nature of Mexica society prior to their sudden rise to imperial power in 1428, despite numerous descriptions in the chronicles and codices. In some instances, later chronicles unconvincingly projected back in time the political and social structure of the imperial age. In other cases, codices and histories portray the early Mexica with an almost Rousseauian nostalgia, describing them as a rustic group with a totally egalitarian social and political structure. Again, the inconsistencies may be partly the result of the Mexica imperial elite’s later rewriting of history. Yet much of the contradictory nature of the evidence on the early Mexica is due to the dynamic nature of their development; Mexica political and social institutions were probably undergoing continuous change in response to their varying fortunes and their rapid cultural evolution. Specific characterizations would only apply to a particular moment in time. However, given the near-absence of relevant archaeological data, the chronology of Mexica evolution can only be assumed on a very general level. The situation is exacerbated by accounts which confuse the features of earlier and later institutions and by fifteenth- century state propagandists’ attempts to create historical precedents or allegorical justifications for the new imperial order.” §REF§ (Conrad 1984, 23) Conrad, Geoffrey. 1984. Religion and empire: the dynamics of Aztec and Inca expansionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Seshat URL: <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/BGTJ339C\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"fw-bolder\"> <b> Zotero link: BGTJ339C </b></a> §REF§",
            "note": null,
            "finalized": false,
            "created_date": null,
            "modified_date": "2024-06-13T10:00:46.454127Z",
            "tag": "IFR",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "expert_reviewed": true,
            "drb_reviewed": false,
            "name": "Government restrictions on conversion",
            "coded_value": "absent",
            "polity": {
                "id": 15,
                "name": "MxPostM",
                "start_year": 1200,
                "end_year": 1426,
                "long_name": "Middle Postclassic Basin of Mexico",
                "new_name": "mx_basin_of_mexico_10",
                "polity_tag": "LEGACY",
                "general_description": "The Basin or Valley of Mexico is a highlands plateau in central Mexico roughly corresponding to modern-day Mexico City. Here, we are interested in the phase of its prehistory known as the Middle Postclassic (c. 1200-1426 CE). By this time, Tula no longer held sway over the region, and had been replaced by several city-states (altepetl). Documents written much later record the dynastic histories and conflicts between these city-states; toward the very end of this period, they came to form growing confederations, paving the way for the Aztec empire. §REF§ (Evans 2012: 123-124) Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/AN5IUQ7X\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/AN5IUQ7X</a>. §REF§  Major centres such as Azcapotzalco, Texcoco, or Cholula likely had between 20,000 and 30,000 inhabitants. §REF§ (Carballo 2019: pers. comm. to E. Cioni and G. Nazzaro) §REF§  Each altepetl was ruled by a king (tlatoani) and a council of nobles. §REF§ (Smith and Sergheraert 2012: 449) Seshat URL: <a class=\"external free\" href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/XC9E2B7Q\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/XC9E2B7Q</a>. §REF§ ",
                "shapefile_name": null,
                "private_comment": null,
                "created_date": null,
                "modified_date": null,
                "home_nga": {
                    "id": 27,
                    "name": "Basin of Mexico",
                    "subregion": "Mexico",
                    "longitude": "-99.130000000000",
                    "latitude": "19.430000000000",
                    "capital_city": "Ciudad de Mexico",
                    "nga_code": "MX",
                    "fao_country": "Mexico",
                    "world_region": "North America"
                },
                "home_seshat_region": {
                    "id": 23,
                    "name": "Mexico",
                    "subregions_list": "Mexico",
                    "mac_region": {
                        "id": 7,
                        "name": "North America"
                    }
                },
                "private_comment_n": {
                    "id": 1,
                    "text": "NO_PRIVATE_COMMENTS"
                }
            },
            "comment": {
                "id": 87,
                "text": "a new_comment_text"
            },
            "private_comment": {
                "id": 1,
                "text": "NO_PRIVATE_COMMENTS"
            },
            "citations": [],
            "curator": []
        },
        {
            "id": 239,
            "year_from": 1610,
            "year_to": 1868,
            "description": "“The fourth settlement that bolstered the Tokugawa peace was that imposed upon the remainder of the population, the commoners, who were divided into several subgroups. In the 1630s, Tokugawa Iemitsu ordered all commoners to register with a Buddhist temple. The system was tightened in 1665 when the shogun ordered the temples to guarantee each person’s religious loyalty. Villagers were not allowed to change places of residence or even travel without permission. The system of registration was thus a tool of political and social control. It was also a means to enforce the ban on Christianity that had been inconsistently imposed on the population since the 1590s.”§REF§ (Gordon 2003, 15) Gordon, Andrew. A Modern History of Japan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Seshat URL: <a href=\"https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/WKE76S3C\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"fw-bolder\"> <b> Zotero link: WKE76S3C </b></a>§REF§\r\n\r\n\"The nationwide anti-Christian policy of early modern Japan evolved from a measure that forced Kirishitan (Christian followers or converts) to abandon their religion. It was first practiced in Kyushu in the 1610s and then gradually spread to other areas. In Kyushu, once a person was suspected of being a Christian, on the threat of execution the govern­ment required him or her to obtain a document from a Buddhist temple certifying non- Christian identity. Buddhist temples antagonistic to Christianity were readily available in all local villages, and public authorities increasingly opted to utilize them as agents of an­ti-Christian inspection. As a result, the idea that being non-Christian meant being Bud­dhist began to take root in Japanese society. For someone suspected of being Christian, a non-Christian certificate issued by a Buddhist temple (or temple certification) was not a matter of choice but a matter of remaining alive. In the 1660s, the Tokugawa bakufu, which had tried various means of Christian suppression, including fumie (forcing a suspect to trample on a Christian image) and group sur­veillance, decided to adopt the system of temple certification.\"§REF§Hur, Nam-lin. 2019. Buddhist Culture in Early Modern Japan. Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/DVW8Z4M2/library§REF§",
            "note": null,
            "finalized": true,
            "created_date": null,
            "modified_date": "2024-02-27T15:17:26.987602Z",
            "tag": "TRS",
            "is_disputed": false,
            "is_uncertain": false,
            "expert_reviewed": false,
            "drb_reviewed": false,
            "name": "Government restrictions on conversion",
            "coded_value": "present",
            "polity": {
                "id": 152,
                "name": "JpTokgw",
                "start_year": 1603,
                "end_year": 1868,
                "long_name": "Tokugawa Shogunate",
                "new_name": "jp_tokugawa_shogunate",
                "polity_tag": "LEGACY",
                "general_description": "The Tokugawa period, also known as the Edo period, ran from 1603 to 1868 CE. Sometimes the slightly earlier start date of 1600 is chosen in recognition of Tokugawa Ieyasu's decisive victory at the Battle of Sekigahara; however, we have selected the 1603 date, which marks his official appointment as shogun. Although the emperor remained the official head of state, the Tokugawa shoguns ruled Japan. The rise to power of the Tokugawa Shogunate marked an end to the internal strife and warfare that had characterized the preceding century. Tokugawa Ieyasu and his immediate successors set about limiting the power of their rivals and instituting new policies aimed at maintaining stability and centralizing Japan's government. §REF§ (Henshall 2012, 54) Kenneth Henshall. 2012. <i>A History of Japan: From Stone Age to Superpower</i>. 3rd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. §REF§ <br>The 'peak' of the Tokugawa period corresponds to the years between 1688 and 1704 CE, known as the Genroku period, which saw the development of a distinct urban culture and the proliferation of art, theatre and fiction. §REF§ (Totman 1993, 280) Conrad Totman. 1993. <i>Early Modern Japan</i>. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. §REF§  During the early modern period the Japanese polity consisted of three major islands: Honshu, Kyushu and Shikoku. §REF§ (Totman 1993, 3-4) Conrad Totman. 1993. <i>Early Modern Japan</i>. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. §REF§ <br>Eventually, economic difficulties and the threat of Western encroachment helped to bring about the end of the Tokugawa Shogunate. The period came to an end with the resignation of the last Tokugawa shogun in 1867 and the imperial restoration in 1868. §REF§ (Deal 2005, 12) William E. Deal. 2005. <i>Handbook to Life in Medieval and Early Modern Japan</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press. §REF§ <br><i>Population and political organization</i><br>The Tokugawa shogunate built on the work of the generals Oda Nobunaga (1534-1582 CE) and Toyotomi Hideyoshi (1536-1598 CE), who between 1568 and 1590 succeeded in uniting all the daimyō (local military lords) under the command of a military leader into a 'national confederation'. §REF§ (Hall 2008, 1) John Whitney Hall. 2008. 'Introduction', in <i>The Cambridge History of Japan, Vol. 4: Early Modern Japan</i>, edited by Kozo Yamamura, 1-39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. §REF§  Theoretically, the daimyō maintained administrative authority in their own territories, but in practice they were expected to follow the guidance of the shogunate. §REF§ (Henshall 2012, 56) Kenneth Henshall. 2012. <i>A History of Japan: From Stone Age to Superpower</i>. 3rd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. §REF§  Tokugawa Ieyasu and his successors pursued a policy of 'orthodoxy and stability', §REF§ (Henshall 2012, 56) Kenneth Henshall. 2012. <i>A History of Japan: From Stone Age to Superpower</i>. 3rd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. §REF§  aimed at consolidating their own power and limiting the ability of their rivals to amass enough power or wealth to enable them to challenge the shogunate. The success of these policies enabled the Tokugawa family to preside over a period of peace and prosperity and rule Japan for the next 268 years. §REF§ (Hall 2008, 6) John Whitney Hall. 2008. 'Introduction', in <i>The Cambridge History of Japan, Vol. 4: Early Modern Japan</i>, edited by Kozo Yamamura, 1-39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. §REF§  As well as peace, political stability and the centralization of power by the shoguns, the Tokugawa period was characterized by economic prosperity, rising urbanization and the closings of Japan's borders to the wider world in the 1630s. §REF§ (Hall 2008, 1, 6) John Whitney Hall. 2008. 'Introduction', in <i>The Cambridge History of Japan, Vol. 4: Early Modern Japan</i>, edited by Kozo Yamamura, 1-39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. §REF§ <br>Theoretically, class was determined by birth and social mobility was prohibited. Influenced by Chinese models, the social order was formalized and essentially frozen in a hierarchy known as <i>shi-nō-kō-shō</i>, 'warrior-peasant-artisan-merchant'. §REF§ (Henshall 2012, 56) Kenneth Henshall. 2012. <i>A History of Japan: From Stone Age to Superpower</i>. 3rd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. §REF§  Despite the shogunate's concerted attempts to maintain a strict social orthodoxy, however, the stable and economically prosperous conditions led to a range of social changes, including increasing urbanization and the rise of the merchant class, who (although they were theoretically socially inferior) now held much of the country's wealth. §REF§ (Henshall 2012, 56) Kenneth Henshall. 2012. <i>A History of Japan: From Stone Age to Superpower</i>. 3rd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. §REF§  Now that there was no need for the majority of those of samurai rank to be actively engaged in military activities, the warrior class became bureaucratized, a development that went hand-in-hand with a romanticization of the warrior ideal and the codification of proper rules of behaviour. §REF§ (Henshall 2012, 56) Kenneth Henshall. 2012. <i>A History of Japan: From Stone Age to Superpower</i>. 3rd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. §REF§ <br>During the Tokugawa period, population censuses were carried out. However, they did not take all members of the population into account and various scholars have therefore used supplementary data to produce what they hope are more accurate estimates. §REF§ (Deal 2005, 63) William E. Deal. 2005. <i>Handbook to Life in Medieval and Early Modern Japan</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press. §REF§  Estimates for the beginning of the period (1600 CE) range from around 15 §REF§ (Farris 2006, 212) William Wayne Farris. 2006. <i>Japan's Medieval Population: Famine, Fertility, and Warfare in a Transformative Age</i>. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. §REF§  to 22 §REF§ (McEvedy and Jones 1978, 181) Colin McEvedy and Richard Jones. 1978. <i>Atlas of World Population History</i>. London: Penguin Books. §REF§  million. The population rose to around 30 million by the end of the period. §REF§ (McEvedy and Jones 1978, 181) Colin McEvedy and Richard Jones. 1978. <i>Atlas of World Population History</i>. London: Penguin Books. §REF§  §REF§ (Totman 1993, 251) Conrad Totman. 1993. <i>Early Modern Japan</i>. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. §REF§ ",
                "shapefile_name": null,
                "private_comment": null,
                "created_date": null,
                "modified_date": null,
                "home_nga": {
                    "id": 21,
                    "name": "Kansai",
                    "subregion": "Northeast Asia",
                    "longitude": "135.762200000000",
                    "latitude": "35.025280000000",
                    "capital_city": "Kyoto",
                    "nga_code": "JP",
                    "fao_country": "Japan",
                    "world_region": "East Asia"
                },
                "home_seshat_region": {
                    "id": 14,
                    "name": "Northeast Asia",
                    "subregions_list": "Korea, Japan, forest part of Manchuria, Russian Far East",
                    "mac_region": {
                        "id": 4,
                        "name": "East Asia"
                    }
                },
                "private_comment_n": {
                    "id": 1,
                    "text": "NO_PRIVATE_COMMENTS"
                }
            },
            "comment": null,
            "private_comment": {
                "id": 1,
                "text": "NO_PRIVATE_COMMENTS"
            },
            "citations": [],
            "curator": []
        }
    ]
}