Home Region:  Mesopotamia (Southwest Asia)

Amorite Babylonia

D G SC WF EQ 2020  iq_babylonia_1 / IqBabAm

Learn more about this dataset.

ℹ️

🗣️ Hit enter to set year.

🗣️ Hit enter to set play rate (inaccurate at high speeds).



Background map





Loading current borders...








Preceding:
[elite migration; Isin] [elite migration]   Update here
Add one more here.

Succeeding:
No Polity found. Add one here.

The Amorites were a tribal group from the Levant area of Semitic descent. They migrated towards Mesopotamia and Amorite names can be seen in Mesopotamian literature throughout the 3rd millennium BCE. By the 2nd millennium BCE a number of Amorites had managed to gain control of Mesopotamian city-states in the power vacuum created by the collapse of the Ur III period. [1] Very early descriptions suggest they were nomadic, eating raw meat and "careless even of burying their dead", but at least part of the population settled into a sedentary lifestyle and took up the western Semetic language of Akkadian. The city and kingdom of Mari was an Amorite establishment. [2]
One problem encountered when considering the Amorites as a polity is that they are frequently identified by their Amorite name, but it cannot be certain whether this corresponds to an individual who is actually an Amorite or if Amorite names are in general use. For example, the Isin-Larsa period is considered a separate polity from the Old Babylonian, Amorite Dynasty, yet the kings of both cities used Amorite names and titles. [3]
The Babylonian king Sumu-la-el started to assert control over other towns in northern Babylonia and in the first few centuries of the 2nd Millennium Babylon became one of several city-states with a limited and fluctuating control over surrounding areas. This was the situation when Hammurabi came to the throne in 1792. By the end of his reign, he had conquered the whole of Babylon and briefly Assyria. He titled himself "King of the Four Quarters of the World" and "King of Sumer and Akkad" [4]

[1]: Goddeeris, A. 2002. Economy and Society in Northern Babylonia in the Early Old Babylonian Period (ca.2000-1800 BC). Leuven: Peeters Publishers. p.8

[2]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.55

[3]: Goddeeris, A. 2002. Economy and Society in Northern Babylonia in the Early Old Babylonian Period (ca.2000-1800 BC). Leuven: Peeters Publishers. p.8-9

[4]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.65-66

General Variables
Identity and Location
Utm Zone:
38 S  
Original Name:
Old Babylonian  
Amorite Dynasty  
Capital:
Babylon  
Alternative Name:
Amurru  
Temporal Bounds
Peak Years:
[1,792 BCE ➜ 1,750 BCE]  
Duration:
[2,000 BCE ➜ 1,600 BCE]  
Political and Cultural Relations
Supracultural Entity:
Mesopotamia  
Succeeding Entity:
Sealand  
Relationship to Preceding Entity:
elite migration  
Preceding Entity:
UNCLEAR:    [elite migration]  
Degree of Centralization:
nominal  
confederated state  
Language
Linguistic Family:
West Semetic  
Language:
Amorite  
Old Babylonian  
Religion
Social Complexity Variables
Social Scale
Polity Territory:
[400,000 to 500,000] km2  
Hierarchical Complexity
Settlement Hierarchy:
4  
Administrative Level:
6  
Professions
Professional Soldier:
present  
Bureaucracy Characteristics
Law
Judge:
present  
Formal Legal Code:
present  
Specialized Buildings: polity owned
Market:
present  
Irrigation System:
present  
Food Storage Site:
inferred present  
Drinking Water Supply System:
inferred present  
Transport Infrastructure
Port:
present  
Canal:
present  
Special-purpose Sites
Information / Writing System
Written Record:
present  
Script:
present  
Information / Kinds of Written Documents
Scientific Literature:
present  
Religious Literature:
present  
Lists Tables and Classification:
present  
Information / Money
Precious Metal:
present  
Article:
present  
Information / Postal System
Courier:
present  
Information / Measurement System
Warfare Variables (Military Technologies)
Fortifications
  Wooden Palisade:
inferred present  
  Stone Walls Non Mortared:
inferred present  
  Stone Walls Mortared:
unknown  
  Settlements in a Defensive Position:
unknown  
  Modern Fortification:
absent  
  Moat:
present  
  Fortified Camp:
unknown  
  Earth Rampart:
inferred present  
  Ditch:
unknown  
  Complex Fortification:
unknown  
Military use of Metals
  Bronze:
present  
Projectiles
  Tension Siege Engine:
present  
  Self Bow:
present  
  Javelin:
present  
  Handheld Firearm:
inferred absent  
  Gunpowder Siege Artillery:
inferred absent  
  Crossbow:
inferred absent  
  Composite Bow:
present  
Handheld weapons
  Sword:
present  
  Spear:
present  
  Dagger:
present  
  Battle Axe:
present  
Animals used in warfare
  Horse:
unknown  
Armor
  Shield:
present  
  Helmet:
present  
Naval technology
Religion Tolerance Nothing coded yet.
Human Sacrifice Nothing coded yet.
Crisis Consequences Nothing coded yet.
Power Transitions Nothing coded yet.

NGA Settlements:

Year Range Amorite Babylonia (iq_babylonia_1) was in:
 (1894 BCE 1596 BCE)   Southern Mesopotamia
Home NGA: Southern Mesopotamia

General Variables
Identity and Location

Original Name:
Old Babylonian
Original Name:
Amorite Dynasty


Alternative Name:
Amurru

[1]

[1]: Millard, A. 2000. Amorites. In Bienkowski, P. and Millard, A. (eds.) Dictionary of the Ancient Near East. London: British Museum Press. p.17


Temporal Bounds
Peak Years:
[1,792 BCE ➜ 1,750 BCE]

Reign of Hammurabi. Before his ascension to the throne, Babylon was one of several petty states of fluctuating importance. By the end of his reign he had gained control of most of Babylonia, taken the old title of King of Sumer and Akkad, and had, for a brief time, taken over Assyria. [1]

[1]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.55


Duration:
[2,000 BCE ➜ 1,600 BCE]

2000 BCE - Ur, of the Ur III period, fell to the Elamites in 2004 BCE. The Amorites are thought to have gradually filled the power gap left in Mesopotamian society. They became kings of city-states, establishing an Amorite elite that would become a Babylonian dynasty. [1]
1600 BCE - At this time the Old Babylonian Dynasty came to end due to an invasion by the Hittites. The Hittites had established a rapidly expanding kingdom in Asia Minor and the king, Murshili I, conquered north-west Syria, then the land around the Euphrates until he reached Babylon. The city was quickly taken, but Murshili I returned to the Hittite capital due to political troubles where he was rapidly assasinated. The Kassite rulers consequently came to power in Babylonia. [2]

[1]: Goddeeris, A. 2002. Economy and Society in Northern Babylonia in the Early Old Babylonian Period (ca.2000-1800 BC). Leuven: Peeters Publishers. p.8

[2]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.84


Political and Cultural Relations
Supracultural Entity:
Mesopotamia


Relationship to Preceding Entity:
elite migration

The elites of Isin were overthrown by Hammurabi of Babylon. [1]

[1]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.65


Preceding Entity:
Isin

(Relationship): The elites of Isin were overthrown by Hammurabi of Babylon. [1]
(Entity): Name.

[1]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.65


Degree of Centralization:
nominal

Until the reign of Hammurabi (1792-1750 BCE), Babylon existed as a petty state. Kings of smaller city-states would pledge their allegiance to one of the bigger city-states thus creating petty states. The allegiance of the small city-states was constantly fluctuating, thus the size and influence of the petty states were also never constant. Babylon had the allegiance of a number of city states put each still had a king and Babylon’s influence was minimal. [1]
Once Hammurabi started his military campaigns, he began exerting military power over former allies, such as Zimri-Lin, then further afield in Southern Mesopotamia. He soon claimed the title ’King of Sumer and Akkad’ and later had control of cities such as Assur and Nineveh, thus becoming king of Assyria. While major administrative changes occurred, many of the governing bodies of the cities remained and a significant degree of decision making remained in the former city-states. [2]

[1]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.61

[2]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.65

Degree of Centralization:
confederated state

Until the reign of Hammurabi (1792-1750 BCE), Babylon existed as a petty state. Kings of smaller city-states would pledge their allegiance to one of the bigger city-states thus creating petty states. The allegiance of the small city-states was constantly fluctuating, thus the size and influence of the petty states were also never constant. Babylon had the allegiance of a number of city states put each still had a king and Babylon’s influence was minimal. [1]
Once Hammurabi started his military campaigns, he began exerting military power over former allies, such as Zimri-Lin, then further afield in Southern Mesopotamia. He soon claimed the title ’King of Sumer and Akkad’ and later had control of cities such as Assur and Nineveh, thus becoming king of Assyria. While major administrative changes occurred, many of the governing bodies of the cities remained and a significant degree of decision making remained in the former city-states. [2]

[1]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.61

[2]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.65


Language
Linguistic Family:
West Semetic

Language:
Amorite

[1] [2]

[1]: Millard, A. 2000. Amorites. In Bienkowski, P. and Millard, A. (eds.) Dictionary of the Ancient Near East. London: British Museum Press. p.16

[2]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.60

Language:
Old Babylonian

[1] [2]

[1]: Millard, A. 2000. Amorites. In Bienkowski, P. and Millard, A. (eds.) Dictionary of the Ancient Near East. London: British Museum Press. p.16

[2]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.60


Religion

Social Complexity Variables
Social Scale
Polity Territory:
[400,000 to 500,000] km2

in squared kilometres. At largest extent. [1]

[1]: Liverani, M. 2014. The Ancient Near East: History, Society and Economy. London: Routledge. p.242


Hierarchical Complexity
Settlement Hierarchy:
4

levels. (1) Large cities, (2) smaller cities, (3) towns, (4) villages
Large cities include the capital, Babylon, and others such as Ur, Eshnunna and Mari. They had monumental palaces and temples. After the collapse of the Ur III period, during the time of the city-state, religious centres had spread from Ur to the new city-states who established temples and religious centres of their own. [1]
Babylon and other major city-states were able to gain power by dominating smaller cities. [2]
Tell Harmal, the site of the ancient town Shaduppum, was under the rule of Eshnunna during the petty state period. It had a town wall, temples (used for administration), shops and domestic houses. [3]

[1]: Gill, A. 2008. Gateway of the Gods: The Rise and Fall of Babylon. London: Quercus. p.56

[2]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.55

[3]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.70


Administrative Level:
6

levels.
(1) Petty state king/ later Babylonian king, (2) city-king/ later district governor, (3) arbianum (head mayor), (4) chairman of assembly, (5) shibutum (elders), (6) puhrum (assembly)
In the first part of the Old Babylonian period, the petty kings were of fluctuating, but reasonably equal standing. After Babylon conquered Mesopotamia, the Babylonian king became superior to all other kings and district governors came into being.
The Head Mayor and Chairman of the Assembly were positions elected by the Assembly. It is likely that the council of Elders were members of the Assembly from the most important houses, or most prominent positions, they were certainly superior. It is probable that any freeman or citizen could be part of the Assembly. [1] [2]

[1]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.68

[2]: Seri, A. 2005. Local Power in Old Babylonian Mesopotamia. London: Equinox.


Professions
Professional Soldier:
present

A kind of professional soldiers were present: since campaigning was seasonal, soldiers fought for part of the year and then acted as a kind of police force. Alternatively they might spend their off period farming the land given to them in payment for military service as described by the soldier Ubarrum. [1]

[1]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.72


Bureaucracy Characteristics
Law

Before Hammurabi, cases were heard by judges in individual cities. These judges appear to have been "ad hoc appointments", probably appointed from the council of elders. Hammurabi established himself as the head judge of the empire, though there existed officials called ’judges of the king’ who probably made a substantial number of the judgements. In the provinces, the puhrum, elders and headman made judgements. [1]

[1]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.71


Formal Legal Code:
present

The Code of Hammurabi is one of the most famous artefacts of the period. While it is considered to be heavy with propaganda it provides evidence for the presence of a law code, even if it cannot be certain how it was actually implemented at the time. There are certainly many contracts and court testimonies surviving to be sure that a law code was in existence and implemented. In particular, the misharum was "a short-term measure, apparently proclaimed orally rather than inscribed on monuments, designed to alleviate social and economic distress" [1]

[1]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.55


Specialized Buildings: polity owned
Market:
present

Commercial activities were carried out in port-side areas called Karums [1] Babylonia was an area particularly short of natural resources, such as timber and stone, so it set itself up as a trader of goods between places such as Anatolia and Afghanistan. [2] There were many merchants selling their own wares. Shepherds had their own flock and kept institutional animals, they were required to give a certain amount to the temple, but could sell the excess. [3]

[1]: Crawford, H. 2007. Architecture in the Old Babylonian Period. In Leick, G. (ed.) The Babylonian World. London: Routledge. p.82

[2]: Gill, A. 2008. Gateway of the Gods: The Rise and Fall of Babylon. London: Quercus. p.65

[3]: Goddeeris, A. 2007. The Old Babylonian Economy. In Leick, G. (ed.) The Babylonian World. London: Routledge. p.200


Irrigation System:
present

Babylonia depended on irrigation to be able to farm because of insufficient rainfall. [1]

[1]: Crawford, H. 2007. Architecture in the Old Babylonian Period. In Leick, G. (ed.) The Babylonian World. London: Routledge. p.82


Food Storage Site:
present

Temples lent and collected food stuffs including corn, they must, therefore, have had somewhere to store it. [1]

[1]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.73


Drinking Water Supply System:
present

Small canals drew water into settlements. [1] Is this drinking water? Is this a pipe network that connects the drinking water to individual properties?

[1]: Crawford, H. 2007. Architecture in the Old Babylonian Period. In Leick, G. (ed.) The Babylonian World. London: Routledge. p.82


Transport Infrastructure

Ports were important areas usually closely related to commercial areas called Karums from where goods could be moved onto other settlements. Ur had two harbours on the Euphrates and one on a canal. [1]

[1]: Crawford, H. 2007. Architecture in the Old Babylonian Period. In Leick, G. (ed.) The Babylonian World. London: Routledge. p.82


Oates [1] remarks that the time and labour devoted to the maintenance of canals, in particular, is striking.

[1]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.71


Special-purpose Sites
Information / Writing System
Written Record:
present

[1] [2]

[1]: Millard, A. 2000. Amorites. In Bienkowski, P. and Millard, A. (eds.) Dictionary of the Ancient Near East. London: British Museum Press. p.16

[2]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.80


Script:
present

Cuneiform. [1] [2]

[1]: Millard, A. 2000. Amorites. In Bienkowski, P. and Millard, A. (eds.) Dictionary of the Ancient Near East. London: British Museum Press. p.16

[2]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.80


Information / Kinds of Written Documents
Scientific Literature:
present

A hoard of cuneiform tablets were found at Tell Harmal, ancient Shaduppum, including texts with zoological, botanical, mathematical and geographical terms. [1]

[1]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.80


Religious Literature:
present

There is a large amount of religious literature from the Old Babylonian period, mostly relating to the new king of the gods Marduk, it includes hymns, prayers and incantations. One of the most famous texts in the Enuma Elish which, in its epilogue, describes the ascension of Marduk to supreme god. [1]

[1]: Oshima, T. 2007. The Babylonian God Marduk. In Leick, G. (ed.) The Babylonian World. London: Routledge. p.82


Lists Tables and Classification:
present

[1]

[1]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.80


Information / Money
Precious Metal:
present

Naditum were women attached to a temple who conducted economic business which included lending silver and corn. [1]

[1]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.73


Article:
present

Naditum were women attached to a temple who conducted economic business which included lending silver and corn. [1]

[1]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.73


Information / Postal System
Courier:
present

Shamshi-Adad had such a rapid courier service that he sometimes dated and timed his messages. Old Babylonia also had fire signals that could be used to send messages, though quite often the signals were not pre-established and the messages miscommunicated [1]

[1]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.70


Information / Measurement System

Warfare Variables (Military Technologies)
Fortifications
Wooden Palisade:
present

Late 3rd - early 2nd millennium BCE text: "My master: the Asag has constructed a wall of stakes on an earthen rampart". [1]

[1]: Ninurta’s exploits: a šir-sud (?) to Ninurta: c.1.6.2. The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature (ETCSL). etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk.


Stone Walls Non Mortared:
present

Late 3rd - early 2nd millennium BCE text: "Its walls were built from stone." [1]

[1]: The death of Gilgameš: c.1.8.1.3. The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature (ETCSL). etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk.


Stone Walls Mortared:
unknown

Late 3rd - early 2nd millennium BCE text: "Its walls were built from stone." [1]

[1]: The death of Gilgameš: c.1.8.1.3. The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature (ETCSL). etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk.


Settlements in a Defensive Position:
unknown

e. g. Laz and Igi-kharsagga [1] , Dur-Sin-muballit [2] It seems that most settlements in Old Babylonia were walled and frequently had fortified gates. [3] Tell Harmal, the site of the ancient town Shaduppum was under the rule of Eshnunna, was surrounded by a wall with butressing towers. [4] What kind of defensive position?

[1]: Hamblin, W. J. 2006. Warfare in the Ancient Near East to 1600 BC. New York: Routledge, 173

[2]: Hamblin, W. J. 2006. Warfare in the Ancient Near East to 1600 BC. New York: Routledge, 176

[3]: Crawford, H. 2007. Architecture in the Old Babylonian Period. In Leick, G. (ed.) The Babylonian World. London: Routledge. p.82

[4]: Oates, J. Babylon. Revised Edition. London: Thames and Hudson. p.70



In the second millennium BCE, "Moats were becoming a common feature of city defenses". [1] e. g. at Kish [2]

[1]: (McIntosh 2005: 189) McIntosh, J. 2005. Ancient Mesopotamia: New Perspective. Santa Barbara: ABC Clio. Seshat URL: https://www.zotero.org/groups/1051264/seshat_databank/items/itemKey/KK2E3KMD.

[2]: Hamblin, W. J. 2006. Warfare in the Ancient Near East to 1600 BC. New York: Routledge, 223



Earth Rampart:
present

Late 3rd - early 2nd millennium BCE text: "My master: the Asag has constructed a wall of stakes on an earthen rampart". [1]

[1]: Ninurta’s exploits: a šir-sud (?) to Ninurta: c.1.6.2. The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature (ETCSL). etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk.




Military use of Metals

[1]

[1]: Hamblin, W. J. 2006. Warfare in the Ancient Near East to 1600 BC. New York: Routledge, 180


Projectiles
Tension Siege Engine:
present

batering ram was in use during this period [1]

[1]: Vidal, J. 2011. Prestige Weapons in an Amorite Context, Journal of Near Eastern Studies 70/2: 250-251


[1]

[1]: Dalley, S. 2000. Ancient Mespotamian Military Organization. In: M. J. Sasson (ed.), Civilization of the Ancient Near East. New York: Hendrickson Publishers, 415.


[1]

[1]: Vidal, J. 2011. Prestige Weapons in an Amorite Context, Journal of Near Eastern Studies 70/2,247, 251


Handheld Firearm:
absent

The first very simple firearms came from China and are dated to 13th century AD [1]

[1]: Ho Peng Yoke. 1997. Gunpowder. I: Selin, H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures. New York: Springer, 389.


Gunpowder Siege Artillery:
absent

The gunpower was invented around 9th century AD, but the gunpowder artillery was in use since Middle Age. [1]

[1]: Needham, J. 1987. Science & Civilisation in China, volume 7: The Gunpowder Epic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 266.


It is well documented that crossbows have not been in use before 5th century BCE. [1]

[1]: Needham, J. 2004. Science and Civilisation in China. Military Technology: Missiles and Sieges vol. 5 part 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 135


Composite Bow:
present

[1]

[1]: Moorey, P. R. S. 1986. The Emergence of the Light, Horse-Drawn Chariot in the Ancient Near East c. 2000-1500 BC, World Archaeology 18:2, 210


Handheld weapons

sickle-sword [1]

[1]: Hamblin, W. J. 2006. Warfare in the Ancient Near East to 1600 BC. New York: Routledge, 180


[1]

[1]: Vidal, J. 2011. Prestige Weapons in an Amorite Context, Journal of Near Eastern Studies 70/2,247, 251


[1]

[1]: Vidal, J. 2011. Prestige Weapons in an Amorite Context, Journal of Near Eastern Studies 70/2,247, 251


Battle Axe:
present

[1]

[1]: Vidal, J. 2011. Prestige Weapons in an Amorite Context, Journal of Near Eastern Studies 70/2,247, 251


Animals used in warfare

The horses were used as riding animals, but uncertain whether they were used in warfare. [1]

[1]: Saggs, H. W. F. 1995. Babylonians. London: British Museum Press, 115.


Armor

[1]

[1]: Rutkowski, Ł. 2007. Problematyka militarna w Państwie Ur III. In: D. Szeląg (ed.), Historia i kultura państwa III dynastii z Ur. Warszawa: Instytut Archeologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 20


[1]

[1]: Dalley, S. 2000. Ancient Mespotamian Military Organization. In: M. J. Sasson (ed.), Civilization of the Ancient Near East. New York: Hendrickson Publishers,414


Naval technology

Human Sacrifice Data
Human Sacrifice is the deliberate and ritualized killing of a person to please or placate supernatural entities (including gods, spirits, and ancestors) or gain other supernatural benefits.
- Nothing coded yet.
- Nothing coded yet.
Power Transitions
- Nothing coded yet.