Home Region:  Mongolia (Central and Northern Eurasia)

Shiwei

600 CE 1000 CE

D G SC WF HS EQ 2020  mn_shiwei / MnShiwe



Preceding Entity: Add one more here.
Succeeding Entity:
No Polity found. Add one here.

According to the earliest known references to the Shiwei in Chinese records dating to the fifth century CE, they occupied the Hulun Buir, Ergüne, Nonni, Middle Amur, and Zeya watersheds, they were divided into between five and twenty tribes, they lived on agriculture and pastoralism, and they traded sable skins. They may have been the ancestors to the Mongols. [1]
Population and political organization
Sources do not provide clear descriptions of Shiwei political organization, but it is worth noting that the Wuluohou, one of the Shiwei peoples, was believed by Chinese record-keepers to have no supreme leader, only tribal chiefs. [2] Similarly, sources do not provide clear population estimates for the Shiwei.

[1]: (Atwood 2004, 502)

[2]: (Xu 2005, 127)

General Variables
Social Complexity Variables
Social Scale
Hierarchical Complexity
Professions
Bureaucracy Characteristics
Law
Specialized Buildings: polity owned
Transport Infrastructure
Special-purpose Sites
Information / Writing System
Information / Kinds of Written Documents
Information / Money
Information / Postal System
Information / Measurement System
Warfare Variables (Military Technologies)
Economy Variables (Luxury Goods)
Luxury Goods
Religion Variables Coding in Progress.
Human Sacrifice Coding in Progress.
Crisis Consequences Coding in Progress.
Power Transitions Coding in Progress.

NGA Settlements:

Year Range Shiwei (mn_shiwei) was in:
 (841 CE 907 CE)   Orkhon Valley
Home NGA: Orkhon Valley

General Variables
Identity and Location
Utm Zone:
48 T
[600, 1000]

Original Name:
Shiwei
[600, 1000]

Alternative Name:
Tatar
[600, 1000]

"Tatar : (Chin. Ta-ta172) a confederation of 30 clans, the Otuz Tatars or perhaps 9 tribes, the Toquz Tatar. Later, a grouping within the Cinggisid confederation, their ethnic affiliation is, in all likelihood, Mongolic. They have recently been identified with the Shih-wei. Probably located East and Southeast of Lake Baikal." [1]

[1]: (Golden 1992, 145)

Alternative Name:
Shih-wei
[600, 1000]

"Tatar : (Chin. Ta-ta172) a confederation of 30 clans, the Otuz Tatars or perhaps 9 tribes, the Toquz Tatar. Later, a grouping within the Cinggisid confederation, their ethnic affiliation is, in all likelihood, Mongolic. They have recently been identified with the Shih-wei. Probably located East and Southeast of Lake Baikal." [1]

[1]: (Golden 1992, 145)


Temporal Bounds
Duration:
[600 CE ➜ 1000 CE]
 

MnShiwe was a period of "Dark Age" when many tribal confederations were on the steppe, such as Zubu, Shiwei or early Mongols. [1]

[1]: (Nikolay Kradin 2016, Personal Communication)


Political and Cultural Relations
Succeeding Entity:
Khitan Empire
[600, 1000]

" From the end of the 9th Century onward, the Shiwei tribes underwent a process of a tribal re-combination and a gradual assimilation with stronger ethnic peoples, the Khitan, Jurchen, Mongols and Han Chinese.127" [1] Subjugated by the Khitans in 942 CE. [2]

[1]: (Xu 2005, 183)

[2]: (Sneath 2007, 29)


Preceding Entity:
583 CE 630 CE Eastern Turk Khaganate (mn_turk_khaganate_1)    [None]  
 

Degree of Centralization:
quasi-polity
[600, 1000]

"Productive activities were organized by the tribal leaders, as described in the Xin Tangshu, "in hunting (the tribes) were banded together, and dispersed afterward; the tribes did not rule over one another or submitted to one another".103 It can be seen that no united tribal confederation had been formed yet by the Shiwei. " [1]

[1]: (Xu 2005, 180)


Language
Linguistic Family:
Mongolic
[600, 1000]
Linguistic Family:
Manchu-Tungusic
[600, 1000]

Religion

Social Complexity Variables
Social Scale
Hierarchical Complexity
Administrative Level:
1
[600, 1000]

levels.
1. Tribal leaders
"The Wuluohou, who were believed a component part of the Shiwei tribal complex, inhabited the northwestern part of Manchuria. The Wuluohou’s pattern of succession in the period of northern Wei (383-534) is recorded in the Wei Shu. It reads, "They had no supreme leader. The position of the tribal chieftain Mofu (Mufuhe) was succeeded hereditarily".95" [1]
"The productive activities were organized by the tribal leaders, as described in the Xin Tangshu, "in hunting (the tribes) were banded together, and dispersed afterward; the tribes did not rule over one another or submitted to one another".103 It can be seen that no united tribal confederation had been formed yet by the Shiwei. Compared with their southern neighbors the Khitan, and the eastern neighbors, the Mohe, in the same period, the social organization of the Shiwei was not as developed. On account of their lower level of social organization, as declared in the Xin Tangshu, "they finally could not become a strong power, although they were valiant and belligerent".104" [2]

[1]: (Xu 2005, 127)

[2]: (Xu 2005, 180)


Professions
Bureaucracy Characteristics
Specialized Government Building:
Absent
[600, 1000]

Law
Specialized Buildings: polity owned
Food Storage Site:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

"The Shiwei people produced millet, wheat and sorghum to the north of the Khitan." [1]

[1]: (Xu 2005, 148)


Transport Infrastructure
Special-purpose Sites
Information / Writing System
Information / Kinds of Written Documents
Information / Money
Token:
Absent
[600, 1000]

[1]

[1]: (Kradin 2015, personal communication)


Precious Metal:
Absent
[600, 1000]

[1]

[1]: (Kradin 2015, personal communication)


Paper Currency:
Absent
[600, 1000]

[1]

[1]: (Kradin 2015, personal communication)


Indigenous Coin:
Absent
[600, 1000]

[1]

[1]: (Kradin 2015, personal communication)


Foreign Coin:
Absent
[600, 1000]

[1]

[1]: (Kradin 2015, personal communication)


Article:
Present
[600, 1000]

[1]

[1]: (Kradin 2015, personal communication)


Information / Postal System
Information / Measurement System

Warfare Variables (Military Technologies)
Fortifications
Wooden Palisade:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Stone Walls Non Mortared:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Stone Walls Mortared:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Settlements in a Defensive Position:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Modern Fortification:
Absent
[600, 1000]

Before the modern era of cannonball warfare


Moat:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Fortified Camp:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Earth Rampart:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Ditch:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Complex Fortification:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Long Wall:
absent
[600, 1000]

Military use of Metals
Steel:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Iron:
Present
[600, 1000]

Majemir culture from 900 BCE is an example of one of the first iron-using cultures in the Altai region. [1] and by 300 BCE in the Ordos region of Mongolia iron was becoming much more frequently used for weapons and horse fittings. [2]

[1]: (Baumer 2012) Baumer, Christoph. 2012. The History of Central Asia: The Age of the Steppe Warriors. I.B.Tauris. London.

[2]: (Di Cosmo 2002, 84) Nicola Di Cosmo. 2002. Ancient China and Its Enemies: The Rise of Nomadic Power in East Asian History. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.


Copper:
Present
[600, 1000]

long been in use in the region. Majemir culture from 900 BCE is an example of one of the first iron-using cultures in the Altai region. [1] and by 300 BCE in the Ordos region of Mongolia iron was becoming much more frequently used for weapons and horse fittings. [2]

[1]: (Baumer 2012) Baumer, Christoph. 2012. The History of Central Asia: The Age of the Steppe Warriors. I.B.Tauris. London.

[2]: (Di Cosmo 2002, 84) Nicola Di Cosmo. 2002. Ancient China and Its Enemies: The Rise of Nomadic Power in East Asian History. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.


Bronze:
Present
[600, 1000]

long been in use in the region. Majemir culture from 900 BCE is an example of one of the first iron-using cultures in the Altai region. [1] and by 300 BCE in the Ordos region of Mongolia iron was becoming much more frequently used for weapons and horse fittings. [2]

[1]: (Baumer 2012) Baumer, Christoph. 2012. The History of Central Asia: The Age of the Steppe Warriors. I.B.Tauris. London.

[2]: (Di Cosmo 2002, 84) Nicola Di Cosmo. 2002. Ancient China and Its Enemies: The Rise of Nomadic Power in East Asian History. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.


Projectiles
Tension Siege Engine:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Sling Siege Engine:
Absent
[600, 1000]

First use of the counter-weight trebuchet 1165 CE at Byzantine siege of Zevgminon. [1]

[1]: (Turnball 2002) Turnball, S. 2002. Siege Weapons of the Far East (1): AD 612-1300. Osprey Publishing.


Sling:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Self Bow:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Javelin:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Handheld Firearm:
Absent
[600, 1000]

"Firearms appeared in Siberia and Mongolia in the 17th century in the form of flintlock rifles. Flintlocks were the only firearms used in most areas until the turn of the 20th century." [1]

[1]: (Atwood 2004, 229)


Gunpowder Siege Artillery:
Absent
[600, 1000]

not in use until much later


Crossbow:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Composite Bow:
Present
[600, 1000]

"The first composite bow with bone reinforced ’ears’, a major development, may have been used around Lake Baikal, c.500 BC. Despite many individual external differences, across the steppe, and across time, the composite bow would remain essentially uniform in construction method." [1]

[1]: (Karasulas 2004, 19)


Atlatl:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Handheld weapons
War Club:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Sword:
Present
[600, 1000]

"The so-called ’Sword of Charlemagne’ is probably an example of an 8th-century Avar sabre, and a similar blade in the collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art is also believed to have been made among Turkic or Mongol steppe people some time between the 9th and 12th centuries AD." [1]

[1]: (Karasulas 2004, 27-28)


Spear:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Polearm:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Dagger:
Present
[600, 1000]

"Among the steppe riders a dagger was typically carried in all periods, and a number of dagger designs are encountered in the archaeological and artistic record." [1]

[1]: (Karasulas 2004, 28)


Battle Axe:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Animals used in warfare
Horse:
Present
[600, 1000]

Horses were the means of travel for mobile nomadic warriors since the establishment of cavalry forces by the mid-first millennium BCE


Elephant:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Donkey:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Dog:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Camel:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Armor
Wood Bark Etc:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Shield:
Present
[600, 1000]

"Shields were known in all periods and, though they are mentioned in the contemporary literature, they only occasionally appear in artistic representations. They were typically made of leather on a reed frame, and a few rare examples survive." [1]

[1]: (Karasulas 2004, 29)


Scaled Armor:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Plate Armor:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Limb Protection:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Leather Cloth:
Present
[600, 1000]

"Shields were known in all periods and, though they are mentioned in the contemporary literature, they only occasionally appear in artistic representations. They were typically made of leather on a reed frame, and a few rare examples survive." [1]

[1]: (Karasulas 2004, 29)


Laminar Armor:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Helmet:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Chainmail:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Breastplate:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Naval technology
Specialized Military Vessel:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Small Vessels Canoes Etc:
Unknown
[600, 1000]

Merchant Ships Pressed Into Service:
Unknown
[600, 1000]


Economy Variables (Luxury Goods)
Luxury Goods

Human Sacrifice Data
Human Sacrifice is the deliberate and ritualized killing of a person to please or placate supernatural entities (including gods, spirits, and ancestors) or gain other supernatural benefits.
Coding in Progress.
Coding in Progress.
Power Transitions
Coding in Progress.